this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
44 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4206 readers
55 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Good stuff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cis2butene@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This will have a major economic cost, but is there any realistic estimate of how this will effect the Russian supplies and for how long? I enjoy Russian holidaymakers having a bad time, but that's more petty than productive.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whatever they hit the bridge with, they can almost certainly do it again, so I'd say the bridge is goneburgers.

The Ukrainians can certainly hit most of the territory between them and the Azov sea with HIMARS, and most of it with barrel artillery, so getting supplies into Crimea is about to become very difficult.

[–] rhys@mastodon.rhys.wtf 4 points 2 years ago

@Ilovethebomb @cis2butene I dunno, the Muscovites have had some success holding off sea drones elsewhere with netting and booms and the like, and the bridge is a far stretch for even Ukraine's longest range missiles.

This is why we should gift them the Type 23s and the HMS Triumph.

load more comments (1 replies)