[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

This fucking broken-ass fascist SCOTUS: "The US military is too WOKE"

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 12 minutes ago

Imagine if knowing about US civics ended with people getting conscripted as immigrants.

"NO, PLEASE, NOT AMERICA"

"WE NEED YOUR CIVIC KNOWLEDGE"

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 34 minutes ago

Blunt is a state of mind 🧘‍♂️

24
Gen Z Truth Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 38 minutes ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 41 minutes ago

I hate linking directly to twitter so have an indirect

28
Gay cafe (lemmy.world)
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

My ex (ages ago) wanted to understand and support my culture better, so she went out and watched Fast and the Furious Tokyo Drift.

Likkeeeee I appreciate the effort but bruuuhh I’m Filipino. Wtf.

That's almost impressive. Multi-level fuck-up.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

By the 1400s-1500s, munitions plate was in fashion for foot soldiers, and even poorer soldiers would have been more likely to been in a brigandine than mail. Mail during the period of full plate was more expensive than a breastplate - European metallurgy had at that point progressed to the point where forging a plate of metal was less resource and labor-intensive than interlocking thousands of individual chain links.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Metal.

Or, uh, Bone?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

This is a common misconception. The idea of the ill-armed peasant levy is largely something that was relegated to the small-scale intrafeudal wars of the period. Most of those called to arms in large-scale wars would have been either middle-class farmers required to have a minimum quality of equipment by law, or else been mercenaries or part-time mercenaries who had a reasonable standard of training and equipment.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

Always happy to spread a little historical minutiae! 🙏

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 31 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian.

Nerva was a temperate and even-keeled man elected by the Senate after Domitian was overthrown, and was a lifelong bachelor with rumors that he had love affairs with men (male affairs were not all that exceptional for Roman men, just something that was noted by the notoriously gossippy Roman histories). He adopted Trajan, who was an adult already and a popular military man.

Trajan was married and had a cordial relationship with his wife, but was quite openly and famously attracted to men. He was, as mentioned, a military man, and one who brought the Roman Empire to its greatest extent, but was noted for having a spirit of cooperation, civility, and due process rather than the dictatorial military mien one might expect from a career soldier. For this reason, the Senate adored him and called him 'Optimus Princeps' - 'The Best Emperor', a title later historians would keep for him.

Hadrian, Trajan's adopted son, was also militaristic and quite openly gay. Unlike Trajan, Hadrian had a bit of a temper and a contentious relationship with the Senate - and his wife! Hadrian, however, was also a cultured and dutiful Emperor who attempted extensive legal reforms to establish the rule of law over the pre-eminence of the Emperor. Mostly it didn't outlast him, but it was a nice thought! He, quite famously, deified his (male) lover Antinous, and Antinous would remain a symbol of male-male sexual attraction for the next ~1800 years.

Hadrian adopted Antoninus Pius, who was straight - in fact, Pius is one of a very small number of Roman Emperors we have no rumors of same-sex activity about. He was noted for his mildness, his justice, and love of peace.

Pius adopted Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus - Lucius Verus died fairly young in his Emperorship.

Marcus Aurelius had a biological son, Commodus, who was... not a good Emperor. At all.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 42 points 4 hours ago

Funny(?) enough, efforts by Chinese-Americans to differentiate themselves from Japanese-Americans to the racist majority of the US were largely successful during WW2.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Probably not flags usually, but there was a great deal of effort made by Chinese-Americans to distinguish themselves as "Not-Japanese" to the white majority of the US during WW2 to avoid getting racism-by-proxy.

350
Heartwrenching (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 hours ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
47
Glorp glorp glorp (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 hours ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/dogs@lemmy.world
89
198
submitted 4 hours ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/cat@lemmy.world
104
Adulthood sucks (lemmy.world)
52
166
115
31
268
view more: next ›

PugJesus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF