this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
138 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

71502 readers
3345 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/12631640

OLED monitor momentum expected to continue — analysts expect 1.34 million units shipped by year end

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] filister@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am waiting for a 4K monitor at least 120fps, that has proper DP 2.1 support. It is ridiculous that even today most of those monitors are coming with DP 1.4.

[–] Vryoptic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What’s the big benefit to 2.1?

[–] filister@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The DP1.4a supports maximum 4K at 120fps, everything above that is using DSC (display stream compression).and if I am not wrong adds a bit of latency and a bit of processing overhead, because your GPU has to compress the frames. Additionally the compression adds some loss to the equation, but according to reports it is very hard to distinguish it from the lossless picture.

It is not a big deal but it is nice to have support for DpP2.1. DP2.1 has more than double the bandwidth of DP1.4a, meaning that it supports 4K 240fps, introduces FEC (forward error correction) and improves the HDR quality.

The bottom line is that if I shed north of 1K I would like to get something which is future proof.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16824012082

You'll have to wait for a new generation of graphics cards to actually get 4k@240Hz without DSC, because while the monitor supports it, the only graphics cards that even have DP2.1 right now don't actually support the required UHBR20

[–] filister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I am aware of that limitation, but hopefully the new gen will have fully featured support for it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

How dare they withhold the tech!