276
submitted 7 months ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/nottheonion@lemmy.ml

In case of paywall: http://archive.today/M5OFY

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is due to activist investors.

That's people who'll buy up enough stock to be allowed at shareholders meetings and then they'll fucking DRILL the C-suite non-stop, derailing the meetings.

It's a good strategy, even if it forces you in bed with evil. Make the rest of the shareholders undeniably knowledgeable and then theyll have to contend with shame or don the moniker themselves. Or start demanding ethical business practices themselves, which is what the lawsuit is ultimately trying to avoid.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

It’s not worth my time & effort to look into these particular investors’ true motivations, but as a rule they’re no more or less to be trusted than the C-suite itself. In almost all cases this is just a game to these people for topping off their Scrooge McDuck swimming pools.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
276 points (98.3% liked)

Not the Onion

2197 readers
494 users here now

For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS