this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)
Daily Maths Challenges
183 readers
1 users here now
Share your cool maths problems.
Complete a challenge:
- Post your solution in comments, if it is exactly the same as OP's solution, let us know.
- Have fun.
Post a challenge:
- Doesn't have to be original, as long as it is not a duplicate.
- Challenges not riddles, if the post is longer than 3 paragraphs, reconsider yourself.
- Optionally include solution in comments, let it be clear this is not a homework help forums.
- Tag [unsolved] if you don't have a solution yet.
- Please include images, if your question includes complex symbols, attach a render of the maths.
Feel free to contribute to a series by DMing the OP, or start your own challenge series.
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
reply
Yes - I mostly left the first part in for the humor (it was legitimately my first stab at the problem), but it gives the same result, just in a way that's a little harder (to me, at least) to see. The cancellation is unbalanced: Each numerator cancels with the next denominator, which necessarily brings with it the next numerator - you've always got the next numerator in line, as-is, after any number of canceled pairs. So while everything cancels out in the limit, the product up to n equals n+1, and so the limit of the product is ∞.