this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
180 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

70461 readers
2507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
180
Neuralink to implant 2nd human with brain chip as 85% of threads retract in 1st (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 132 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

"asked if Neuralink would perform another surgery to fix or replace the implant, but the company declined"

Evidence whether the company saw them as a person, or felt any ethical obligation...

It's an interesting era when an organization can have a single user, and choose to leave that single user with 85% of the promised functionality no longer functional. But is happily pursuing it's second user.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While it sounds a like a dick move, there probably was a reason they would prefer other patients. Maybe it's more risky to do surgery second time? I don't really blame them for this one, their goal is to take best steps to develop technology before they make it widespread and really functional. I blame them for all of those animals death though.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there probably was a reason they would prefer other patients.

yeah, they fucked up on this one and want a new test subject.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I mean yes. They wouldn't be part of a study of two different tests were tried or even the same test install twice.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah. I also can think of lots of reasonable reasons, but if those were the real reasons, the company should still be making commitments and plans with their first user...

The healthy stuff sounds like: "We intend X follow up procedure, but it needs to follow Y precaution."

Hell, even companies that have no intention to help usually take the time to lie and claim that they do.

load more comments (12 replies)