If it’s all dumped into a single commit, I will whip your computer into the nearest body of water and tell you to go fish it out.
I'm going to steal this for an update to an internal guidance document for my dev team. Thank you.
If it’s all dumped into a single commit, I will whip your computer into the nearest body of water and tell you to go fish it out.
I'm going to steal this for an update to an internal guidance document for my dev team. Thank you.
People are too hard on Janeway. She didn't have great options here. I'm sure if she could have, she would have sacrificed Ensign Kim - for not refilling the coffee replicator.
Yes. This sounds like another brilliant spin-off from Game Changer.
The formula should stay entertaining for about as long as they can find interesting people to invite to the crowd.
I would be glad to watch many seasons of this.
Definitely not unique to Stargate. I remember a cast member from Power Rangers commenting on how interesting it was that so many rock filled quaries were key strategic targets to the various forces invading earth...
The tactics in Wolfenstein: ET were brilliant.
That's totally fair, and I'll keep it in mind.
I hope my habit makes your life a little easier by normalizing they/them (or just avoiding gendered terms) as an un-interesting default.
I hope for a world where they/them becomes accepted as "I'm not trusted enough by this person to be told their pronouns yet, and that's okay."
I think asking people to identify their gender, early in a (non-intimate) relationship, is a particularly unhealthy cultural habit. I hope I'm helping push back on that, a bit.
In the meantime, I'm trying to learn speech habits that don't force you to gender yourself, or to be noticed in not doing so. I hope to help make these kinds of situations easier for you.
You shouldn't have to decide at a random moment whether to share your gender identity with me. I'm committed to keep trying to learn communication patterns that make it natural for you not to have to.
Yeah. Which I'm sure is what they're officially selling. That's fair. Long term, walking robots are likely only going to succeed thanks to learning algorithms.
I find it suspicious that this company is touting their AI enhancement while admitting their product can't be trusted to navigate an apartment alone.
Personally, I would select homes with simple layouts, before conceding to constant monitoring, if I could. But I couldn't do that if my mix of math and AI was outright bad, and it couldn't handle it...
To me, this smells like over-promising and hoping new AI algorithms outpace their promises.
And having a remote operator just looks like a lot like a classic mechanical turk scam.
AI is propping up the blockchain bubble that already popped.
Both have been primarily interesting solutions looking for problems to solve without any hard work, rather than having any worthwhile investment strategy, in most cases.
There's people doing hard work with block chain and AI to solve real problems. But there aren't "the vast majority of venture funds" number of people doing that.
I am constantly amazed at how long it takes folks to realize their money is being pissed away.
An alternative less generous assumption is that they're mostly just laundering crime money, and so don't mind the high rates of loss.
Beat me to i...
This is going to be a great time to be a lawyer... until the climate kills us all, of course.
When unsure of what the Captcha is trying to learn from me, I find "Kill all humans." is a pretty good guess what the Captcha is really after.
"Our AI security reviews 20,000 configurations every hour. Your money is safer than - shit. Well, nevermind. There's no money left. Excuse me, I need to leave the country."