1
63
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

If you’re a US citizen, no matter where in the world, start by making sure you’re registered to vote. Many districts are gerrymandered, so you’ll want to register as the party that’s likely to win congressional and/or state legislative districts where you live, and vote in that party’s primary.

In addition to voting, you’ll want to influence politics beyond that. Your local races are a good place to start; cities and states control local land use and things like building codes.

To affect congress, you’ll want to pick swing house districts or swing senate seats. Volunteer and donate accordingly.

For President, the reality is that Biden has done far more than Trump would even consider, starting with the Inflation Reduction Act, and continuing through numerous executive actions. Getting involved in this race means volunteering, and if you can, donating to the Biden Victory Fund. If you’re giving really large amounts of money, and the logistics of it work, go to an in-person event and talk to the candidate or other official about climate:

2
34
submitted 2 hours ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3
40
submitted 9 hours ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/climate@slrpnk.net

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/461229

The leap in emissions is largely due to energy-guzzling data centers and supply chain emissions necessary to power artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The report estimated that in 2023, Google’s data centers alone account for up to 10% of global data center electricity consumption. Their data center electricity and water consumption both increased 17% between 2022 and 2023.

Google released 14.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide just last year, 13% higher than the year before.

Climate scientists have shown concerns as Big Tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Microsoft continue to invest billons of dollars into AI.

4
63
submitted 10 hours ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/climate@slrpnk.net

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/460748

Scientist Erica Chenoweth, who studies civil resistance at Harvard Kennedy School in Cambridge in the U.S., showed that every movement that mobilized at least 3.5% of a population was successful. This led to what’s known as the 3.5% rule — that protests require this level of participation to ensure change.

But the figure can be misleading, Chenoweth cautions. A much larger number of people are probably supporting a successful revolution even if they aren’t visibly protesting.

5
23
submitted 11 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
6
18
submitted 14 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7
11
submitted 14 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
8
75
submitted 20 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
9
120

A new generation of engineers has realized they can push heat pumps to the limit.

10
39
submitted 21 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
11
47
submitted 22 hours ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
12
60

I just got my first bill since going to a community choice power provider. Here in California, the investor owned utilities (commercial companies, not the publicly-owned utilities) act as retailers of energy. They buy power on the open market from generators, then sell it to their customers. They bill both for the cost to generate the power, and also for power delivery (which includes maintaining the grid). An option that recently became available is for a city government to join a community choice power provider, which then buys power from generators on our behalf. The utility still delivers it, so it’s not real competition, but partway there. The community choice provider then bills the utility, who passes that bill along to individual customers.

So, the generation cost went down by about 30% for power used during the day, and a few percent for power delivered at night (three different time-of-use categories). Our community choice provider has an option for 100% renewable power, which I chose, so this is a pretty tangible demonstration that renewable power really is cheaper than fossil fuels.

13
32
14
39
submitted 1 day ago by jorge@feddit.cl to c/climate@slrpnk.net
15
33
submitted 1 day ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
16
149

Article is free with registration (use a throwaway email account)

It is reversing a ban on oil and gas drilling, and is proposing a “fast-track” for big projects, including mines, that bypasses environmental checks. It has cut climate programs and jobs, scrapped electric vehicle subsidies, abandoned plans for one of the world’s largest marine sanctuaries and set aside a world-leading cow “burp” tax as it questions the science on methane, a potent greenhouse gas.

17
10
submitted 1 day ago by hanno@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
18
62

Archived copies of the article: archive.today ghostarchive.org

19
283
20
61
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
21
177
submitted 1 day ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
22
66
submitted 1 day ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
23
38
24
43
25
22
view more: next ›

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4684 readers
540 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS