jeffw

Ohhh now the whole Rust controversy makes sense. I always thought it was weird that they got upset about 1 person dying when hundreds died for the John Wick movies

Better yet, divide into North and South California to win the Senate

“Jimmies”

So… Philly? Boston?

Actually, the article seems to be saying that with the overlap, it’s still just 1:02 missing

All hail the quarter earnings report!

That’s not how odds ratios (or research) work. The compares groups of cell phone users and non-cell phone users.

With that being said, we’ve always known cell phone use has a correlation with very slightly increased cancer rates. That shouldn’t be controversial. It’s not concluding that there’s a direct cause or even, if they did cause it, that it’s from RF.

I always knew cancer caused people to use cell phones!

Edit: on a serious note, the confidence interval for malignant tumors is an odds ratio of 1.2-3.4, although a quick google finds more recent studies (I.e.: not based off of 1990s cell phones) are even lower.

Most of the “files” they are hiding are CSAM fwiw. Most of the rest was released with redactions

Now combine them both and do average monthly payment.

Even with higher prices, lower interest rates mean lower monthly costs

A 7% interest rate doesn’t help

If we turned all of global beef demand into grass-fed, we’d literally decimate our output because there’s not enough grazable land.

Even land categorized as agriculturally grazable is often not realistically grazable (think mountains, etc)

So few cattle rely on by grass tho