393
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, you're right, I'm not being rigorous here. I'm just co-opting big O notation somewhat inaccurately to express that this isn't going to get as big as it seems because the number of upvotes isn't going to increase all that much.

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I guess I have a different intuition. For me, O notation applied normally shows that it will not get far because it rises exponentially or if you count the steps in relation to the number of users, it's O(log n) which doesn't go high. No need to apply it inaccurately

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
393 points (87.7% liked)

AnarchyChess

4899 readers
13 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS