300
submitted 6 months ago by toni_bmw@lemmy.world to c/retrocomputing
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lightnegative@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Me too. 2000 seemed.... Slow compared to XP on the same hardware, but to be fair the hardware I had was cobbled together from parts that my father's employer was going to throw out

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

It looked a lot sleeker too. I had my UI heavily customized, including the boot and login screens, and it made me feel like such a hacker. 2000 made me feel like I was working at an office.

[-] toddestan@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Microsoft put a lot of work into speeding up the boot times with XP. Windows 2000 booted glacially slow by comparison. Though I'd say once booted, 2000 was a bit leaner and quicker.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
300 points (99.0% liked)

retrocomputing

4216 readers
61 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS