-1
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TerryCustard@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

Contains racial slurs which are a realistic portrayal of how people would talk at the time it is set, but which are difficult for the students to hear repeated in a classroom setting, regardless of context

[-] theory@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Theres only so much you can coddle students though, before its just a bit silly

[-] Granary@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I'd agree with that. It's probably a positive thing for children to be exposed to that sort of language in a controlled environment where the teacher can explain historical context. It's not like they'll be avoid racial slurs forever

[-] charlytune@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

Are you talking about white kids, or black kids though? I think the issue is that black kids unfortunately will hear that language anyway, as the targets of it, and that hearing it read out in the classroom is going to be a very different experience for them.

[-] Senseibu@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

If they also studied a book that contained racist terms for white people, then it would be fair in that context.

However are there any racial slurs for white people that are as offensive as it is for black people? I don’t honestly think so.

Societies moving on, time to drop off mice and men from the syllabus and educate as to why it was removed in a different classroom setting.

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4060 readers
83 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS