32
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by slopjockey@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

...And if it weren't for that one joke by Hannibal, Bill Cosby would be very uncontroversial.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"wikipediocracy"? fucking seriously?

for all the good and bad bits that wikipedia has (and there are notably many of the latter too), a rulership is definitely not among that list afaik. wtf.

(e: I'm going purely off the domain name there, but holy shit what a name)

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 15 points 2 months ago

literally started by a guy who was banned for trying to set up a business to write wikipedia articles, and the evils of JIMMY WAAAAAAAAALES!!! still fill his spleen

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago

aaaaand then I actually looked at the page. fuck me it's even worse.

[-] grumpybozo@toad.social 8 points 2 months ago

@froztbyte @sneerclub Well, if the vast majority of people in a community share a consensus reality and basic principles, you don’t need a formal governance structure to oppress hallucinating sociopaths.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

968 readers
3 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS