666

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Over just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study finds. Researchers found wild fluctuations—called drift—in the technology’s abi...::ChatGPT went from answering a simple math correctly 98% of the time to just 2%, over the course of a few months.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] teydam@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is peer-reviewed? they use a line in the discussion which seems relatively unprofessional, telling people to join a 12-step program if they like to use artificial training data.

[-] ghostinthessh 9 points 1 year ago

I think arvix has no rule requiring a paper be per reviewed before uploading.

[-] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Not affiliated with the paper in any way. Have just been following the news around it.

[-] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ArXiv papers are never peer reviewed.

[-] teydam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023

666 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59757 readers

2298 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS