131
submitted 1 week ago by Recant@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mox 86 points 1 week ago

Who cares? It’s run by reactionary incels, transphobes, and racists.

Wait until you find out who runs Lemmy development.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 27 points 1 week ago

Good news, most folks at beehaw know and the admins have decided to move to a new platform

[-] remington@beehaw.org 47 points 1 week ago

Correct. We're moving to Sublinks very soon. Buckle up.

[-] mox 14 points 1 week ago

Will it federate with Lemmy? I would miss you folks.

[-] remington@beehaw.org 16 points 1 week ago

It's my understanding that it will...I believe that's, also, what it means when they (Sublinks developers) said it would be "Lemmy compatible".

[-] mox 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That could also mean client API-compatible, so Lemmy apps would work with it, which doesn't address federation.

[-] remington@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago

Maybe so. We should, probably, ask @Penguincoder@beehaw.org about this.

[-] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Pong. @mox@lemmy.sdf.org , in sublinks, the federation services are entirely separate from the API of the instance. So much separate, the federation services are written in a programming language called Golang. The API service is written in a programming language called Java.

One aspect does not require or preclude the other with Sublinks.

[-] mox 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Indeed, protocol is independent from implementation language, but that isn't the question at hand.

Do you know whether Beehaw will still federate with the lemmyverse (and therefore the rest of us) after moving to Sublinks?

[-] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 9 points 1 week ago

The current aim of Sublinks is Lemmy parity for V1 release. So yes, I do see Beehaw still federating with Lemmy instances at the on-set.

[-] remington@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago

Thanks for clearing that up!

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

then what's the point if you're still not getting away from the same people?

[-] millie@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

Y'all just don't even bother moving your eyes over the text before you post, do you?

[-] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

That's like saying what is the point of misskey (and its forks) when it can be seen by people on mastodon. Isn't that the whole point of the fediverse?

[-] refalo@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Yes I don't understand the point of misskey either. It just seems to be a Japanese clone of mastodon with a small, differing interpretation of some parts of ActivityPub.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Sublinks exists because the developers of Lemmy have repeatedly ignored feature requests from instance admins and acted in a hostile manner towards them. They're unpleasant to work with, so a bunch of people decided to no longer work with them and create their own project.

It feels like you're only capable of seeing the "logical" point for something to exist friend. Misskey is to Tumblr as Mastodon is to Twitter.

load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)
load more comments (55 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
131 points (99.2% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17515 readers
4 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS