101
Is Backblaze a reliable provider? (infosec.pub)
submitted 4 months ago by Findmysec@infosec.pub to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi everyone,

I've started pushing backups of media important to me (family pictures, video etc) to backblaze with client-side encryption.

However, are they a reliable storage provider? I can't help but compare them to something like Amazon who likely has a better chance of maintaining my files but they are so expensive that I don't even bother.

What do you think? Yes, I've heard of 3-2-1, however for now I only have backblaze and a local backup. I'm trying not to spend too much on this.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kcg@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

I use them as my backup backup provider. Crazy cheap, my bill was like $1.50 for a month. Their backup command line tool is pretty solid also. I would definitely use them if you need a new backup provider.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

How was it so cheap? How much data are you storing

[-] Kcg@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It is $6 a TB. I use less than a TB. Their whole sthick is being cheaper than others. It is a very basic service overall. But does it's job.

Also they publish drive stats which is pretty cool to have that transparency.

[-] xnx@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago

Oh ok. $6 a TB but if you use the computer backup instead its $10 for infinite storage which is great

[-] Findmysec@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah well I have over 3TB to store

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

So.... $18 a month? That's a Netflix subscription homie.

[-] Findmysec@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

That's personal pictures, ripped media, documents, some sensitive information etc. Netflix can go to hell

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

I wasn't saying to use Netflix that doesn't even make sense. I was saying that's the same price as a Netflix subscription...

[-] TheFrenchGhosty@lemmy.pussthecat.org 1 points 4 months ago

And that's more expensive than a lot of other providers

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

It's more expensive than one other provider, iDrive. But iDrive doesnt provide nearly the same level of service. Back laze is the cheapest full featured B2 service on the market. If you are concerned about data integrity of your backups but you cannot afford $18 a month, then you cannot afford to have that much data.

[-] Findmysec@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

I admit that Storj is less expensive but it has egress costs which B2 + cloudflare doesn't (the latter with a free account)

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
101 points (97.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40403 readers
356 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz