272
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If you haven't heard her interview with Rachel Maddow last week, go listen to it. This woman doesn't deserve any of this shit, and is currently being threatened with jail if she doesn't give up identifying information about her 13-year old daughter in a court sanctioned harassment campaign by Trump's lawyers, is not able to work to support herself, has had her identifying information posted on Twitter by a DHL driver Trumpist, and may also lose her home. All of this because she told the truth. It's fucking disgusting.

Regardless what you think of her lifestyle choices, she doesn't deserve to be constantly hunted and harassed by MAGA psychos who are doing nothing but ruining this woman's life, and potentially her young daughter's. Listening to the Interview, I honestly thought her to be an absolutely lovely and intelligent person who is just trying to do the right thing, and getting her life ruined in the process.

Edit: find the GoFundMe and toss her a couple bucks if you have some to spare. I'm really hoping E Jean Carol steps in with some of the money Trump owes her and pledges some support. A bigger "fuck you" to Trump than us all having to do so to make sure Daniels stays safe.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

They’ll torture any woman who comes forward to scare the next ones out of speaking up. This is a tactic to ensure that no other Trump victims come forward, and it’s disgusting.

I’m glad people are supporting her, but the justice system should do more to protect her from this harassment.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I heard a story in this vein that made my skin crawl. I won't assume so this will over explain, but I'll be brief:

Popular stream trope is to go to drunk areas and interview attractive people while they're drunk

Some dude interviews drunk girls about sex stuff.

Girl says "you gotta give it that hauk tua" implying you gotta spit on cock for a good blowjob/get sloppy/etc.

She gets bizarre instant fame. If you search "hauk tua" you will find her and her new ...career? Anyways

She's now "influencer" overnight. Is on tons of podcasts.

Some podcast asked "you into older guys?" She said "oh yeah" podcaster proceeds to ask her if she'd give Donald Trump the old "Hauk Tua", asking her if she'd suck DJTs cock.

Hard pass. No thanks.

Now, she's getting dragged through the mud. People have said that her response was "disrespectful to the former president."

Like... What the actual fuck.

So much about the story is bizarre, but... Disrespectful to the former president to not suck his dick.

Monica Lewinsky must be pissed.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Damned if you suck, damned if you don't.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
272 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18129 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS