87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)
Legal News
211 readers
216 users here now
International and local legal news.
Basic rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flag
Some cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules apply
All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
For context:
source
So somewhere around the 1% of their annual profit, not even pocket change. In other words - they've not been given a fine, but rather a pass to continue doing whatever the fuck they want at a nice low cost.
Yeah, this is only $24 per illegal car. If the fix costs more than $24, it’s literally cheaper to just ignore the problem and eat the fine.
Again, I suggest we change the penalties for these crimes to be triple damages, which is already common for other civil penalties. And we base that number on the company's annual base revenue, not the net income or profit.
If the company moves $55 billion a year that's what the penalties are based on, even if they only profit $500 million. It's the only way to actually make breaking the law no longer profitable.
That would be nice, but sadly it'll never happen (not as long as companies making that much profit, and whose owners therefore wield the kind of power that comes with that, and the system that encourages and enables their existence, exist).
Hey, as long as the government gets their cut, it's a-okay 👍