479
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I already enter a passphrase every time I want to use Signal; I use the Molly client on my phone. It's really not a big deal. I also enter a passphrase every time I launch my password manager, every time I launch my two-factor authentication app on my phone, and every time I open my email client. I think it's fairly standard to protect sensitive data on your computer with encryption at rest and to decrypt it upon launching the application that handles the data.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s really not a big deal

For most casual users, it is a deal-breaker. And it's hard to get everyday people to use your software with roadblocks like that.

every time I open my email client.

You must not get email very often, this is absolutely a non-starter for me.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

For most casual users, it is a deal-breaker. And it’s hard to get everyday people to use your software with roadblocks like that.

That's fair enough, but the way the mobile app works is that you can opt in to having encryption at rest with a passphrase, so if you want to leave your signal database unencrypted you can.

You must not get email very often, this is absolutely a non-starter for me.

Once you open it you can leave it open if you need notifications. Sometimes I leave it open, sometimes I just want to check my emails and then close it. Idk, I really think typing in a password for authentication/decryption regularly is such a non-issue, like for instance do you not regularly type in a password when you run a command with sudo? Again, if it's opt-in I also don't see the issue, except for the issue of allowing people to not encrypt their Signal data thus potentially compromising the people they're messaging, but obviously that issue is currently universal for Signal desktop.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Huh. I would've thought most desktop users just leave it running all day long like I do. Obviously there is the disk encryption passphrase at boot, adding another one for signal would in my case be redundant.

But the point is not only how easy it is to enter a passphrase, but also how much security that actually gains you. I don't think it does much on the typical desktop, be it windows or linux, where there are so many ways to escalate or persist privilege for anyone that has user-level access.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

I would’ve thought most desktop users just leave it running all day long like I do.

They do. OP is not a normal user.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Obviously there is the disk encryption passphrase at boot, adding another one for signal would in my case be redundant.

I also have full disk encryption, but I still have some databases on my disk encrypted because I decrypt my disk when I boot my computer. But yeah if you have Signal open (& its db decrypted) all the time it would probably be minimal. I don't have Signal open all the time though, only when I want to check messages or am actively using it

I don’t think it does much on the typical desktop, be it windows or linux, where there are so many ways to escalate or persist privilege for anyone that has user-level access.

The point would be encryption, even the root user wouldn't be able to read encrypted data if they don't have the passphrase

[-] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

If you have root, intercepting all the user's keystrokes is trivial.

[-] tmpod@lemmy.pt 0 points 1 month ago

This has nothing to do with the mobile app, which also has password/biometric unlocking, it's about the desktop electron app.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I know. I never said it was about the mobile app?

[-] kbal@fedia.io -2 points 1 month ago

You did but it says "desktop" right in the page title.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I'm now genuinely not sure what you're saying. I did what? I said it was about the mobile app? I didn't say it was about the mobile app?

[-] kbal@fedia.io -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I'm not mistaken you were talking about how things work "on my phone" but I suppose you had in mind that the principle would apply to desktop as well.

In practice it does somewhat come down to how well containerized and locked-down the environment is, so I think the difference does matter. Android for instance sucks in very many ways, but it's somewhat reliable in usually keeping apps from interfering with each other. There are a few desktops that try to do that, but they're still not too popular I think. Desktop users are used to having full control of everything. Seems to me the pervasive compartmentalization of everything (it wouldn't be sufficient for the purposes we're talking about to put only Signal in a secure container) is accepted as necessary on mobile devices mostly because so many of the apps are terrible.

[-] communism@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

If I’m not mistaken you were talking about how things work “on my phone” but I suppose you had in mind that the principle would apply to desktop as well.

Yes, I was using it as a comparator as an example as to why it's not a big deal to type a password every time you open an app, which I don't think is any different between mobile and desktop.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
479 points (94.3% liked)

Privacy

30690 readers
1303 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS