480
submitted 4 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Having Signal fill in gaps for what the OS should be protecting is just going to stretch Signal more than it already does. I would agree that if Signal can properly support that kind of protection on EVERY OS that its built for, go for it. But this should be an OS level protection that can be offered to Signal as an app, not the other way around.

Damn reading literacy has gone downhill these days.

Please reread my post.

But this should be an OS level protection that can be offered to Signal as an app, not the other way around.

  1. OSs provide keyring features already
  2. The framework signal uses (electron) has a built in API for this EXACT NEED

Cmon, you can do better than this, this is just embarrassing.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Why exactly am I re-reading your post? Im in complete agreement with you? Should I not be?

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
480 points (94.3% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
658 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS