9
Have got vs Have (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by foofiepie@lemmy.world to c/english@lemmy.ca

Hi folks.

Can I ask: Is it better to say “We’ve got to get going” or “ We have to get going”?

I hear the former in conversation and it slightly irks me. I think it’s because of the redundancy (?) in the sentence. Which is better, grammatically? The latter feels cleaner. Am I wrong?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Potatomache@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

If I remember correctly, "have got to" is more informal than "have to". So yeah, it's cleaner/more grammatical.

I think most people use the "got" as a extra word to emphasize urgency in day to day conversation. So in that way, it's useful?

[-] galilette@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm also in camp of "the longer the angrier". Next in the escalation list would be "our ass", followed by "fxxking"

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
9 points (90.9% liked)

English usage and grammar

360 readers
2 users here now

A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.

If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]).

Online resources:

Sibling communities:

Rules of conduct:

The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.

(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS