124

Which TLDs are too risky for hosting? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by miles@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With several Lemmy instances using the .ml TLD I’ve seen people mention others being risky as well. Which should be avoided?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] oleorun@lemmy.fan 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Funny that you say that: my first problem was of my own making - I was using arm64 hardware and Lemmy doesn't quite support that architecture yet, so I ended up getting a Synology myself this week. It's awaiting disks and then I plan on moving Lemmy to that box.

Thanks for sharing that site - I'll make good use of it once the drives get here.

The instructions worked out, but the troubleshooting steps need to be fleshed out more. Again, probably my issues, like DNS. I learned a lot though.

[-] slugworth@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I love my Synology NAS. It’s the DS920+. I’ve had it for a couple years. I upgraded the memory to 8 GB and use Portainer for a docket UI. I have 24 containers running on my NAS now, including sab, radarr, sonarr, deluge, joplin, piped/hyperpipe, youtubedl, jellyfin, pihole, and lemmy. 8gb of memory and about 45% used. Plex also runs as a native DSM package.

[-] oleorun@lemmy.fan 4 points 1 year ago

I've got the DS923+. It's replacing a very old but very functional QNAP that I've had for years. Alas, QTS or whatever the OS is called is slow and clunky and after using our DS920+ at work I made the decision to get a Synology.