1
Why did the #TwitterMigration fail?
(blog.bloonface.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Fediverse
62 readers
3 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.
founded 2 years ago
You misunderstand what kbin is, if you think there's A server that has to cover operating costs. kbin isn't a site, it's just server software, it's meant to be run in many many places, and those individual servers talk to each other.
I thought that kbin was a website in Poland that implements the ActivityPub protocol and so it's able to talk to and share posts with other websites in the "fediverse" such as: Lemmy, kilioa.org, fedia.io, ect.. because they implement the same protocol. But I'm very new here so I'm not really sure!
Who's going to be paid for the ongoing maintenance of the software? Who's going to pay for the servers the software's run on? A decentralized architecture doesn't remove the operating costs of a large scale social media site. As the article alludes to, it might even increase operating costs.
To be honest, I'm not interested in small, niche communities. I want the fediverse to grow into something that can rival social media giants like Reddit, and Twitter. How a site is monetized is as key of a feature as anything else, because without monetization, a site is doomed.
I'd imagine no one in particular. It's donations and open-source model. Eventually (if it gets popular) it might get some other business model or grants from FOSS funds. Remains to be seen.
Same here. Donations and/or whoever hosts the servers. Instances should grow to whatever their maintainer can afford/has planned. Then they should close signups. Other instances might pop up. There are currently a lot of Lemmy instances and some people are starting to spin up new kbin instances.
Eventually someone is probably going to try ads for their site.
But fediverse is not just "a site". It's many. They all have their own rules, plans and ambitions.
I never thought of how capping sign ups doesn't affect you in the fediverse... you can just sign up on a different instance! Very cool to think that server hosts can stay within their own limitations.