353
submitted 2 months ago by nekandro@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Knowing you have HIV decreases transmission by 90%. Giving antivirals decreases transmission by 99%. Back in the early 2000 I saw a paper saying we could make HIV tests for 10 cents a person if we wanted to produce enough for every person on the planet (0.1810^9= $800 million). That was something that could have been done back then. $40 a vaccine would be a price tag of $320 billion

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 months ago

Even with PrEP distributed freely (with a prescription) HIV is still spreading. So unfortunately it's not purely a money problem. A vaccine you only have to take yearly would dramatically change the landscape of transmission.

[-] anachronist@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

PrEP is very expensive. It is covered potentially partially by insurance.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago

I said distributed freely. That's the case in a lot of places in Europe and Asia and I've read enough times on reddit that many Americans get it for free too.

this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
353 points (99.7% liked)

World News

32160 readers
705 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS