230
submitted 4 months ago by ArcticDagger@feddit.dk to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArcticDagger@feddit.dk 11 points 4 months ago

I think that hypothesis still holds as it has always assumed training data of sufficient quality. This study is more saying that the places where we've traditionally harvested training data from are beginning to be polluted by low-quality training data

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

It's almost like we need some kind of flag on AI-generated content to prevent it from ruining things.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

If that gets implemented, it would help AI devs and common people hanging online.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

File it under "too good to happen". Most writing jobs are proofreading AI-generated shit these days. We'll need to wait until there's real money in writing scripts to de-pollute content.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
230 points (96.7% liked)

science

14885 readers
301 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS