34
submitted 2 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/legalnews@lemmy.zip

X said the companies worked against their economic self-interests in a conspiracy violating US antitrust law

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

When it's directed at them (Conservatives) it's an economic conspiracy and a violation of antitrust law (?), but when it's directed at brands/companies they don't like, like Bud Light/Anheuser-Busch, well that's perfectly acceptable. While it must suck ass to do legal work for Musk, it must be nice getting paid to work on BS legal cases and coming up with pie-in-the-sky rationales.

[-] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The bud light fiasco was more consumer-driven than company-driven, no?

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
34 points (97.2% liked)

Legal News

216 readers
147 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS