303
submitted 1 year ago by Peaces@infosec.pub to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago

"Days later, Tam reversed his decision and decided that Li had a case to answer, saying it was the defence who must bear the burden of proof, not the prosecution."

Holy crap. You could be accused of anything and if you can't prove its a lie then bye bye.

[-] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago

Guess what? We have that in the US too. It's called civil asset forfeiture. Only your property is on trial and you have to prove it wasn't used to commit a crime.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

Yup, and we should 100% abolish that nonsense. And while we're at it, let's abolish qualified immunity as well.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
303 points (96.6% liked)

World News

32255 readers
497 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS