1281
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Also, they quote $10k for "supportive housing" and show a picture of San Francisco. I guarantee that's not accurate. The state needs to pay to house these people, but we need to be realistic about the cost.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Housing in places like SF is expensive because of private landlords jacking up proces to the moon. If the government owns the property and gets to control the cost then it’s really not any more expensive than housing them anywhere else. Better still it puts those people within the range of public services like transit so they can actually work on getting themselves into a better situation.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

And where does the government get this land from?

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Cities have more property than you’d think. They homd a lot of it so they don’t get locked out of being able to do things like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1281 points (98.0% liked)

Solarpunk Urbanism

1769 readers
3 users here now

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Checkout these related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS