1614
And it'll be the most subtle, unassuming envelope too.
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1614 points (99.3% liked)
People Twitter
5034 readers
1656 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
US thing I'm guessing? Here in Sweden, we don't get much spam mail in the first place but you simply put a "no ads" sign on your mailbox and then only get the stuff you need. The 8 years I've lived in my current apartment I've gotten like 3 things that weren't bills and stuff I need.
In the US, conservative lawmakers have been waging a quiet war against our postal system for a while now.
Highlights: They forced it to be self-sustaining (cut federal funding), then when that didn't kill it they forced it to, in a very short time frame, pre-fund retirement benefits ahead of time for all current and former employees.
The postal system is more or less dependent on the funds it gets from spam mailers.
Edit: To clarify, I'm not insinuating that the bulk/majority of its income is from junk mail, I'm just stating that its not nothing, so they don't really have an incentive to kill that source if revenue.
It's one of the only things in the constitution they are required to have. I don't understand how privatizing it was ever constitutional.
The Constitution hasn't mattered for a while, only the parts of it the Court likes... Which is increasingly little of it.