this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13867 readers
872 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The link is Elon's reply to the OP.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wild_dog@hexbear.net 32 points 8 months ago (15 children)

It never made sense that blocking someone stopped them from seeing your public posts

Yes it does. It's actually good to make it harder to stalk people. Yes, it wasn't a perfect system but every layer of extra work makes it harder to harass people who blocked you is good.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago (14 children)

That doesn't make it any harder for someone to harass you. They can't harass you if they can't interact with you.

And being worried about stalking is extremely counter to posting something publicly.

[–] wild_dog@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago (7 children)

The current system makes it harder because you have to create a new account. There are people who are either too dumb to realize they can do that or just won't bother jumping through the extra hoops. Obviously it's not perfect, but it's better than doing this.

And being worried about stalking is extremely counter to posting something publicly.

Using Twitter on private kinda sucks. It makes the site less fun. All this is doing is making it so the creeps can have more fun on the site while marginalized people being harassed by those creeps have a worse experience on the site. not sure why y'all are defending this but whatever.

[–] drhead@hexbear.net 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only hoop you have to jump through is using a Nitter instance. And the most dangerous abusers are most likely going to be determined enough to where doing this or creating a new account is not a deterrent.

False security is worse than no security. If people trust that the block function is reliable at stopping people from seeing your posts, and then those people post things publicly that they wouldn't share otherwise, that is leaving more people vulnerable than having no way to stop people from seeing your posts.

[–] wild_dog@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

Most people don't know what Nitter is. Most people aren't "the most dangerous users," they're lazy, so any extra steps is a deterrent. Keeping the weak deterrent is still a net positive.

The types of posts i'm talking about here aren't things like "this is where i live" but innocuous things that transphobes or racists decide to take out of context. I would post all these things publicly but it's good to be able to make them more private from the freaks who are gonna freak out bc I said trans kids exist and put me in a cringe compilation to encourage others to harass me. Twitter never made it impossible to do that, but Elon's making it easier.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)