49
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Today, the Russian government has neither the intention nor the capability to launch the sort of premeditated conventional attack on NATO that the new missiles are supposed to counter. Russian nuclear "saber-rattling" is intended to deter NATO from intervening directly in Ukraine, and thereby starting a NATO-Russia war. There remains however an acute risk that an unplanned mutual escalation could lead to war. In this case, U.S. missiles firing into Russia from Germany could easily be the tripwire for nuclear catastrophe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] neblem@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Even if you disagree with my assessment of Russia's annexation, isn't an international body ( that Russia itself has membership) working with your people, with guarantees for self rule and an end to the war better than status quo?

If you've supported Donbas independence, with wishes for greater ties to Russia instead of Europe, you still get that in this agreement. Donbas can still legitimately join Russia in a few decades, and still trade with them now.

[-] froh42@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Of course Donbas will join Russia with your scheme. All the Ukrainians have been displaced. It is nothing else but colonization of Ukraine by Russia.

To be fair, only the people who lived in Donbas until the little green men invaded 8 years ago would need to be asked in a referendum.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
49 points (90.2% liked)

World News

32326 readers
914 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS