46
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago

I agree they are price gauging. That has nothing to do with my argument.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they are checking receipts because an increase in theft I am ok with it

Theft is a product of their price gouging

Any financial loss to my local store will have to be collected in prices of their goods to keep the business open

No they don't

I wish they didn’t have to.

They don't have to, they're making money hand over fist

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 year ago

So then be clear and say you are angry at them for price gauging and not just get angry at them for everything they do for their business.

[-] ram@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Everything they do "for their business" is detriment to human beings. It's relevant, and thus why I bring it up.

I'm not just mad at them for price gouging. I'm mad at them for everything they do "for their business".

[-] dom@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Increased theft is the cost of price gouging. It should have been built into their calculations.

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

What you say is true but the decision to check receipts may have come from a store manager just trying to solve a problem in their store. That manager can't really force the giant corporation to make less money no matter that they are being jerks.

[-] juusukun@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

They dgaf about corporate social responsibility. You know, the bullshit universities were going on and on about while telling us we would be the next generation of CEOs, all the while selling us useless degrees that couldn't even get us a fucking supervisor position at a dollar store.

Honestly bruh, there's being an "armchair expert" and then there's being in touch with reality. Your choice

[-] Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago

You really don't like it when someone has a different opinion huh?

[-] juusukun@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It kind of does when you say they "have to" raise either prices. Why can't they take the loss and let it eat into their excessive executive compensation packages? They could take a huuuge hit without going into the red.

I take it you subscribe to the belief that the only way to successfully run a business is to have ever increasing years of historically high record profits, year after year, at any and all costs?

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
46 points (94.2% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
396 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS