399

Look, you can't complain about this after giving us so many scenarios involving N locked chests and M unlabeled keys.

https://explainxkcd.com/3015/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] okamiueru@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I have never played ~~R&D~~ D&D (or, I did once, but had a bad experience), so bear with me.

Is it ever allowed to simply do the thing, instead of rolling dice? For example in this case, to place 5+5 tokens upside down, and pick two of them? Or fold pieces of paper, etc?

Edit: I meant D&D of course. Don't know where the R came from.

[-] BartyDeCanter 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'd absolutely allow something like that at my table. Something like this isn't going to have explicit rules, so even in a serious RAW (Rules As Written) game, the GM is going to have to come up with something. It's just that we all have dice and may not have the right setup for tokens, etc.

Really, the simple way to do it is have arrows #1-5 be the cursed ones. The player then rolls a D10 to see which ones are pulled, rerolling on repeat "arrows".

[-] wunami@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

You have less arrows to pull from on subsequent rolls. You can't keep using a D10.

[-] BartyDeCanter 4 points 6 days ago

That’s why you reroll on already taken numbers. Or drop down a die size every two arrows.

[-] deur@feddit.nl 3 points 6 days ago

Now someone has to do the math on how many rolls on average it will take to resolve the action given the chance of rerolls.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
399 points (98.3% liked)

xkcd

8896 readers
240 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS