50

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/23129803

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

If the Slicer works well

I think this would be the biggest issue.

I had a bit of experience with 5 axis machining and the programming of it is far from trivial.

3 axis is really easy to automate, the paths are quite straightforward, especially for 3D printing when you go layers by layers.

As soon as you add a 4th axis nothing is straightforward anymore. You have a high probability of collision between the extruder and the workpiece and now instead of having a single mathematical solution on how to go from point A to point B you have multiples options and no "right" option, it all depends on how the machine is built and the shape of the part.

[-] Machinist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yup. This is one area where machining and machine movement is still an art. It can be scienced but it's expensive to model a machine that well and CAM software still needs a lot of handholding beyond 3ax moves. That will eventually change, I expect someone will slap some 'AI' into CAM. I wonder, however, if it won't actually require something close to general AI for real world utility.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And if they put a license on it: https://github.com/jyjblrd/Radial_Non_Planar_Slicer/issues/1

Or, if someone comes up with an alternative.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
50 points (98.1% liked)

3D Printing

4455 readers
22 users here now

For everyhting 3D printing related.

Please be excellent to each other :)

Icon by Freepik, Banner photo by Thiago Medeiros Araujo

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS