59
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/interestingshare@lemmy.zip
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] finderscult@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

And you're not understanding the machine itself takes by far most of that carbon which is released at a later point when it is slaughtered, not sequestered. It is released and wasted, most of it removed from the local cycle unless you Aussies are to the point of spreading human feces and butchers waste back on to fields.

No animal is a carbon sink. Some plants are, not grasses, but some plants can be. Some fungi might be. Animals are not.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 10 hours ago

But the carbon of the animal itself is a small percentage of the grass itself. Im not claiming the animap itself is a sink but the proccess the animal has upon the environment is.

this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
59 points (95.4% liked)

Interesting Shares

1076 readers
28 users here now

Share interesting articles, projects, research, pictures, or videos.


Please include a prefix in your title!


Prefixes for posts

Certain clients offer filters to make prefixes searchable. Photon (m.lemmy.zip) used for hyperlinks below:


Icon attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS