this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)
retrocomputing
4441 readers
30 users here now
Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Someone on the SDF Mastodon got bent out of shape because I suggested a computer with those specs might be considered 'retro', haha.
Right now, the only retro machines I have accessible are my Tandy 1000TX and my C64, but my actual preferred machine for most things retrocomputing is one that I built out of a bunch of my spare parts:
Biostar M6TLC Slot 1 Motherboard PGA 370 Slotket 500MHz Mendocino Celeron PGA370 CPU 128MB of 168 pin SDRAM Sparkle SP5200 RIVA TNT2 Vanta AGP Soundblaster 16 CT2940 ISA 3Com Etherlink III ISA 1.44MB FDD, DVD-ROM, 20GB HDD Running MSDOS 7.1 (stripped from Windows 98SE)
The only picture I have of it was taken in the dark with a Mavica, so I won't bother posting it, haha.
What makes hardware “retro” is certainly an interesting question. This machine is 24 years old, although I’m using it to recreate an experience closer to thirty years old.
At the same the Pentium III came out, the Apple II line would have been 22 years old. Was the Apple II considered “retro” in 1999? It was only six years discontinued at that point…
I think retro will invariably be the generation of computer the person in question used as a youth. Maybe.
That's very similar to the point I made! To one of the folks I was talking to, any x86-based machine wasn't 'vintage' but a Commodore 64 might fit the bill - sure, the C64 entered the market a decade earlier, but it was on the market until after the introduction of the P5 Pentium.