378
She's right (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It’s a way chronically ill people talk about energy.

Our bodies tend not to be as resilient as healthy people. So if we do too much (ie. use too many spoons), instead of recovering after a day or two like healthy people would if they did too much, we tend to have our health worsen for long periods.

So the analogy is you have a limited number of “spoons” (energy) each day, and you have to use it wisely.

Obviously, this doesn’t impact every disability and is mostly used by chronically ill people and people with energy limiting conditions.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 weeks ago

While I love spoon theory I think it's a poor metaphor to use for general audiences as it requires a lot of context. I guess this tweet is not really targeted at everyone, but just a rant to their circle.

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 weeks ago

What metaphor would you suggest instead? At least in my experience, the term is becoming understood more and more by the mainstream.

[-] sartalon@feddit.nl 4 points 3 weeks ago

I never heard of it before and while I did not immediately fully understand it, I did understand and empathize with its point. I guess what I am saying is this is an anecdotal story that supports your argument.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
378 points (97.0% liked)

Chronic Illness

276 readers
1 users here now

A community/support group for chronically ill people. While anyone is welcome, our number one priority is keeping this a safe space for chronically ill people.

This is a support group, not a place for people to spout their opinions on disability.

Rules

  1. Be excellent to each other

  2. Absolutely no ableism. This includes harmful stereotypes: lazy/freeloaders etc

  3. No quackery. Does an up-to date major review in a big journal or a major government guideline come to the conclusion you’re claiming is fact? No? Then don’t claim it’s fact. This applies to potential treatments and disease mechanisms.

  4. No denialism or minimisation This applies challenges faced by chronically ill people.

  5. No psychosomatising psychosomatisation is a tool used by insurance companies and governments to blame physical illnesses on mental problems, and thereby saving money by not paying benefits. There is no concrete proof psychosomatic or functional disease exists with the vast majority of historical diagnoses turning out to be biomedical illnesses medicine has not discovered yet. Psychosomatics is rooted in misogyny, and consisted up until very recently of blaming women’s health complaints on “hysteria”.

Did your post/comment get removed? Before arguing with moderators consider that the goal of this community is to provide a safe space for people suffering from chronic illness. Moderation may be heavy handed at times. If you don’t like that, find or create another community that prioritises something else.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS