this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
27 points (86.5% liked)

science

18776 readers
1122 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I thought we were only able to produce antimatter in minuscule amounts. How the hell does anyone have a “truckload“ of it?

[–] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it's cause you need an entire truck of scientific instruments to contain it.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That’s what I figured, but that doesn’t really mean there’s a “a truckload” of antimatter, just in antimatter containment equipment. The actual amount of antimatter is probably very tiny.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago

The headline is misleading clickbait, unfortunately.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is a load on a truck. Therefore, it is a truckload.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago