If you read your own article, this is a plug for continued development of gas-fired power plants which are better than coal but still are burning fossil fuels and are heavy polluters.

And if you do the math at worst, you'd be paying a few extra cents for nuclear power than for renewables supplemented by gas fired peaker plants. And those are not carbon capture gas fire beaker plants. Those are just straight up gas plants belching sulfur dioxide directly into the atmosphere...

Large-Scale nuclear would be $0.16 per hour versus gas with CCS at $0.19 per hour. But they're claiming that they can do solar for $0.10 per hour and that if they combine solar and gas it'll be $0.13 per hour

The issue is you can't just have gas without having CCS. If you're planning on fixing the environment so the cost for solar plus gas and CCS comes up to roughly $0.18 per hour per kilowatt

This is all based off of the numbers provided in the article