this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

Legal News

396 readers
20 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The whole argument from the judge is baffling since he literally gave the full discretion to the trustee in his initial order to determine the process of the auction, and now the judge says that the same discretion was invalid.

If I were a betting person, I would say that politics of it all got involved in this case.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Of course it did. The assets were supposed to be sold to a rich rightwinger.

load more comments (1 replies)