330

In the face of ‘eradication’, one trans activist is preparing to fight – and she’s sick of silence and neglect from her supposed allies. Raquel Willis tells Io Dodds why Republican bathroom bans are everybody’s problem

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It's a matter of degree. I felt a heck of a lot more protected than I had previously. Action? Not as much as there should have been but hardly zero.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You only get action when you're living in a blue city, under a blue state, with a blue President.

If anyone on the stack is Republican, your civil rights dissolve in the face of bureaucracy and legalese.

Republican courts, Republican governors, Republican sheriff's department, Republican school board... anything is enough for Dems to defer and compromise on your liberty.

They won't even stand up for their own elected Congressional coworkers to use the fucking restroom.

With Trump in office, you're going to see Dems retreat from any kind of LGBTQ rights on a sweeping scale. Just wholesale capitulation, as they blame their electoral defeat on being insufficiently servile to bigots.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

If anyone on the stack is Republican, your civil rights dissolve in the face of bureaucracy and legalese.

This is so easily disproven and it's not the way our political system works. If it were, a single Republican in congress would kill a bill.

Republican courts, Republican governors, Republican sheriff’s department, Republican school board… anything is enough for Dems to defer and compromise on your liberty.

No, it's not and frankly that level of hyperbole isn't constructive.

With Trump in office, you’re going to see Dems retreat from any kind of LGBTQ rights on a sweeping scale.

What do you mean "retreat from"? If you mean being vocal on that stance I'll bet you a cookie you are wrong. What kind of cookie is your favorite? If you mean being actually able to effect any positive change, you are only right up until the midterm elections next year.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

If you mean being vocal on that stance I’ll bet you a cookie you are wrong.

“Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face. I have two little girls. I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat, I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.”

~ Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)
  1. That's the opposite stance.
  2. They did actually say that and were obviously not afraid to do so.

Edit: I'll share cookies with you anyway.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

hardly zero.

Yeah, like I said: little. It felt like they were content to do enough to get credit and then kick the can down the road until they were forced to do more. Now we enter an era that will likely strip back what progress has been made. In four years we'll be pushed back forty.

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

They are political creatures. I wouldn't say they were "content to do enough to get credit" so much as lacking the courage to do more. But I'm also not going to blame them for doing what they think is most likely to keep them elected even if I vehemently disagree with that.

A shocking percentage of the US population is transphobic and the answer is not to expect politicians to put votes on the line to "do the right thing" (LOL) but to work to ensure they don't have to because that transphobia goes away.

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

How the hell does 1% of the population get 50% to stop hating it and believing bullshit about it

[-] enbyecho@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

I feel like you are thinking in absolutist terms. We do not need every person to accept our right to exist, only enough to move policy and cultural-level acceptance forward. That is already happening, slowly but surely. In my lifetime we've gone from "lock em up and give em a lobotomy" to being able to be safely visible most of the time and for it to be common to state pronouns.

It's not perfect and it's not where we need it to be but it is light years ahead of where we were. And this progress, even if things get forced back for a time, is inevitable.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
330 points (93.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2001 readers
1172 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS