this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
20 points (83.3% liked)

science

20575 readers
330 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Retraction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17687-3, published online 25 August 2020

i didn't hear it anywhere, so thought it to be news-worthy

[edit] As noted below by Neuromancer49, there's a new published version with corrections. Published: 19 December 2024

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Neuromancer49@midwest.social 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Nope, not significant. The paper was retracted because a few extra sequences were included, but the conclusion remained the same when they redid the analysis.

ETA: Link to the new paper https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17687-3