this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
717 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

62012 readers
5597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 123 points 1 month ago (24 children)

just grow a pair and ban twitter, spacex, starlink, and tesla from operating in europe already.

there's no good reason to let them operate.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online -4 points 1 month ago (14 children)
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (13 children)
[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Have you never been to small and poor ^/s^ countries like Germany where this sometimes is the best option for getting internet access? ^/srs^
Edit: Added tone indicators because no one got it

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Starlink, in some places in Germany is the only usable option. We have shitty infrastructure.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it was the statement that Germany is a "small and poor country" that they were whaaaating about.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They used that as sarcasm to highlight that Germany has no excuse for having shit infrastructure due to their wealth and economy size, unlike other countries.

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks, at least someone got it. We are the third biggest economy on this planet and still have the shittiest internet connection a developed country can possibly have, and all of that is only because one corrupt politician said (as in "was paid to say") that Television is the technology of the future. It's getting better, but holy fuck, how could this happen.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

People in my state in the US have to get starlink sometimes because our infrastructure is so poor. I overheard a conversation a few weeks ago while working out in the country. A woman was saying she hated giving money to Musk but there was no good option there.

[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mate tf are you on about? Small and poor like Germany?

[–] Haribro@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the context of Internet connectivity it might as well be (and I think that's what the joke was about). Fiber build-out is atrocious and large areas are stuck on 16mbps speeds. Coincidentally cell coverage also sucks in these areas so starlink is the only way to get Internet with decent speed.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's not "small and poor".

Edit: Oh, it was a German "joke". Now I understand. :)

Although I'm REALLY skeptical that for more than maybe 1% of the population that Starlink is the best option.

[–] twei@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

German humor :)

maybe 1% of the population [...]

That would be more than 800k people, although the number of affected people does not make a difference. You don't even think about taking communication away from anyone without there being a replacement for them. And in the scope of Germany, this means that we'll need starlink access for the next decade or so.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)