this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
256 points (97.8% liked)

science

15546 readers
376 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

As far as I'm aware China hasn't been making any noise about annexing my country, so I guess I do see a difference.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You must be in Canada? I thought Chinese dominance over your real estate market was actually a significant issue, requiring recent legislative action.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You thought wrong.

Foreign home ownership makes up a relatively small part of our housing market. Focus on it is mostly a misdirection from the real causes of our cost-of-living problem which is home grown housing speculation and lack of investment in social housing. And even were foreign home ownership occurring at a problematic rate, that's nothing in comparison to annexation of a country.

[–] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Dunno. Vancouver's pretty fucked for housing and that's got 6.2% foreign ownership rate. I wouldn't mind being able to have a shot at affording a home in my city.

It's not the ONLY reason housing is fucked but 6.2% isn't nothing.

load more comments (1 replies)