Expanding the terms of copyright to 70 years after the life of the author actually didn’t help artists make art. Expanding copyright to cover “training” will result in more costly litigation, make things harder for small artists and creators, and further centralize the corporate IP hoarders that can afford to shoulder the increased costs of doing business. There are inumerable content creators that could and will make use of generative art to make content and they should be allowed to prosper. We need more fair use, not less.

That's not true? There's nothing stopping content creators from using their own content to create models. In fact, that's my exact project for some of my visual art.

Moreover (edit: visual) models can't effectively replicate the copywrite, so I don't really see how it would infringe on it.