this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
1106 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

5828 readers
1892 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

πŸ˜‚.

That made me chuckle. Naughty LLM.

On a level though I don’t really get the disdain for them as search is a nightmare now and it’s a lot easier to just get the LLM to do it for you.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Except when it hallucinates, draws from biased sources, or straight-up responds with false information.

I'd rather look through the available links myself and research the direct source things came from. AI isn't trained to look specifically for factual information. Unfortunately, a lot of people aren't trained for that, either. But we can still educate ourselves. Relying on a bot is putting one more space between the information you receive and the source that created it.

I'd rather get my information from as close to the original source as possible. Only then can I determine if the source is even worth trusting in the first place.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

When I use LLMs for search, I always ask for sources and then follow up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)