this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
160 points (96.5% liked)

DeclineIntoCensorship

226 readers
28 users here now

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not saying this couldn't happen, but this justdoesn't ring super true to me. How would the user know who the "identified individual" was, how they found the husband's information, or who they called (the "friend") at his company that's apparently in control of his employment? That's a lot of convenient coincidences that, even of they are true, would hardly be easily accessible information to make such a confident accusation.

[–] lonerangers1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

truepeoplesearch.com

give it a go. Try searching your name, number, address and see what you get.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the employer is an University or something like that in a smaller state, and they called specifically about a policy change or something happening at the department of education, it could be relatively easy to happen, especially if they gave their name when calling the representative (which I guess you would).

[–] ech@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Your face is an assumption