this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
111 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
3021 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anti sematic behaviour is unfortunately part of the internet and general historical data, which means it could very well be an undercurrent in training data. AIs then could exhibit subconscious biases, no matter how many times the creators tell them not to be racist.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nono, the theory most people hear is the one about AI taking over. I read the original post with the theory written there devolving into this big giant global conspiricy where (coded language for jewish shadow government) is profiting off of everyone because of the AI takeover.

The idea that human contnet is getting croweded out, that part i absolutely buy.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

See I don't follow that one, because how are they actually making money in this theory?

In the real world the ai bullshit is just another grift that's a giant money pit. While I recognise people that follow these kinds of theories probably don't have critical thinking skills, I wish they would following thinking to it's conclusion. It's a stupid hope I know.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's where most of the secret new cabal theories fall apart.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

For sure. I can at least give them the benefit of the doubt when they say that shadow organisations are trying to control them. Like that can happen, it does happen, it's kind of happening. Motivations can range from societal change to world ending prophecy. However when they say shit is explicitly for making money, that's a very clear cut goal you can easily prove or disprove.