this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
18 points (78.1% liked)
Privacy
1442 readers
153 users here now
Protect your privacy in the digital world
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
- No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
- Stay on topic.
- Don't promote big-tech software.
- No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
- No crypto, blockchain, etc.
- No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
Related communities:
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Signal is a little sus. We should be applying pressure for them to allow federation. They don't wanna remove the phone number requirement cos spam sure let everyone else we handle that u keep doing your thing with phone numbers and allow us to do ours and still communicate.
That is kind of naive.
"Allow federation" it's not a simpke switch, it's probably a full project of it's own, and if they only hace X resources for development, taking on a big project like federation might just not be a priority.
yet the reason that "Signal is expensive" https://signal.org/blog/signal-is-expensive/ is because they didn't go for a federated approach, they spend more money just to keep the servers running than resources spent on development
Not to mention the SMS bills