I feel like my “all-time favorite” changes depending on my mood, but if I had to pick just one, I’d probably go with The Witcher 3. That game just hit all the right notes—amazing story, incredible world-building, and so much stuff to do without feeling like pointless filler. Plus, the expansions were just as good, if not better than the base game.

What about you? Are you more into RPGs, shooters, or something else entirely?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] duchess@feddit.org 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I'd say that Portal 2 even improved the first one in every aspect.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm on the fence about which is better. Portal 2 is an improvement, but also has its flaws.

Part of the reason I would argue Portal 1 was better is because it was so unexpected. I went in expecting "interesting puzzle game" which it is, but I did not expect to also get "excellent humor with strange horror vibes and incredibly good personality."

If someone didn't know what a Glados was I think the first one is better. I also recognize that many people who have never played Portal are well aware of Glados.

[–] duchess@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I guess something Portal 2 lacked was the element of surprise.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 9 points 5 days ago

Portal felt like a very long, pretty well-done tech demo, but Portal 2 is where it's at.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

I dunno. Frankly they're both absolutely pantheon, legendary games that deliver a near-perfect gaming experience, but I feel like Portal 1 delivered a kind of tighter package where Portal 2 meanders just a little bit, and while Wheatley is still brilliant I'm not sure I he hit the same way or struck the same tone as GlaDOS. But we're talking about like nanometers of difference in quality here either way as both games are goddamn stellar.

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I felt that Portal 2’s difficulty curve was a little off but was perfect other than that. It was too easy for most of the game and then ramped up to what I consider to be a good difficulty level later on.

The two player portion was fantastic though.

[–] duchess@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

Difficulty balance is especially hard for puzzle games, I guess. You can get a good estimate with lots of testing (ha!) with many participants, but even then you or me personally can be outliers.